Obama’s war of words over trade deal puts pressure on Clinton
![](https://s.yimg.com/cd/resizer/2.0/FIT_TO_WIDTH-w800/9910187d6131be959ee7c6ad41d8efae5faa90da.jpg)
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama’s decision to escalate his fight with the Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic Party over a free trade deal with Asia is unwelcome news for Hillary Clinton.
Former Secretary of State Clinton, who is now running for president,
had been keeping her head down on the trade issue — and on the
fast-track trade authority that Obama is seeking in order to execute the
deal. Despite her past support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership deal,
which she in 2012called “the gold standard,” she has remained noncommittal on it since announcing her presidential bid.
Labor and progressive groups are eager
to see Clinton come out swinging against the deal. But Clinton would
open herself up to charges of flip-flopping and cynical pandering if she
did so now, given her past remarks and her generally pro-trade
positions in the past.
“What would be her reason for opposing it? She hasn’t laid the
groundwork for that with any articulation of serious concerns about this
trade deal,” said a senior-ranking Democratic congressional aide. “She
probably wants fast-track authority if she’s going to be president.”
If Clinton were to vocally back the deal, however, that could give
oxygen to one of the other declared or likely candidates for the
Democratic nomination, such as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) or former
Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, both of whom oppose the deal. And while
Clinton at present far outpaces both men in polls, fighting members of
her own party on the trade deal could pave the way for union
endorsements for her opponents and give them strength on the ground in
early-contest states.
“TPP is treacherous territory. It proves that … even without a dozen
well-funded primary opponents, she’ll still have to navigate a bunch of
tough issues that various segments of her base consider critically
important — all without alienating swing voters for the general,” said
Dan Newman, a Democratic consultant who is working for California U.S.
Senate candidate Kamala Harris and the state’s lieutenant governor,
Gavin Newsom.
Union and liberal organizer support for Clinton’s opponents would drain
resources, time and energy from her campaign that otherwise could have
gone to preparing for a general election.
“Whatever the merits of the TPP, this issue has become a surrogate
within the party for a larger debate about corporate power and fairness,
which puts her in a difficult spot,” said David Axelrod, a former top
political adviser to the president.
“She was the [secretary of state] when these negotiations began, and
the previous Clinton administration was closely identified with trade.
But it is a volatile issue, and supporting it could add to fears on the
left that she is too oriented toward big business and give additional
impetus to a potential primary challenger,” Axelrod said.
“In the end, this is one where [Clinton] is going to have to take a gut
check and choose. And she would probably do best by choosing the side
in which she genuinely believes, even if it buys her some grief,” he
noted. Obama “could relieve some of that pressure” on Clinton “by making
a compelling case” for the trade deal, he said.
The president should stress “a cooling-off period for review before he
signs and another before Congress votes, and specific standards for
labor, human rights, and the environment, with the ability of Congress
to rescind fast track if the standards are deemed not to be met,”
Axelrod said.
When asked if he thought Obama was doing enough to make a “compelling
case” for the deal, Axelrod said, “It’s a tough hill to climb. He just
needs to keep climbing.”
Obama and the White House have been feuding with Warren for days over
her opposition to the trade deal. But during the weekend, the president
made his most pointed comments about the liberal Democratic senator from
Massachusetts, in an interview with Yahoo News.
Obama told Yahoo’s Matt Bai that Warren is “absolutely wrong” in her
opposition to the trade deal and that her warnings of a Republican
president using authorities given to the executive in the deal to unwind
Wall Street regulations are “made up.”